Not my style, but it's the message that matters. And it's said much better than I could say it.
I "borrowed" this from Erik over at The Electronic Replicant.
Oh... and I like her eyelashes.
Until next time...![]()
Not my style, but it's the message that matters. And it's said much better than I could say it.
I "borrowed" this from Erik over at The Electronic Replicant.
Oh... and I like her eyelashes.
Until next time...![]()
Thanks to Daniel for pointing me to this excellent blog entry discussing Initiative 1 by a gay couple in Florida Ohio who has adopted four children. You should give it a read.
Arkansas. Where to start?
Having lived in Arkansas since 1991, I have sadly come to understand how "mentally backward" most of the population is here. To start with: there are HUGE Pentecostal, Southern Baptist and Church of Christ populations here. Many—if not most—towns have more churches than their population can even support. So, we know the "sheeple" don't think for themselves and take their cues from the people leading their congregation (and obviously not from what is in the Bible).
Add to this religious "fervor" all the rednecks, hillbillies and other "white trash" that one thinks of when one thinks of the South and you have a good idea about the ideals of the population in general. Did you know there are still "sundown towns" here, many of which "host" various white supremacist groups. Even though the Husbear and I "blend in" with our tattoos and mean-ish looks, many of these towns are places even we won't stop in if it can be avoided.
Obviously not all of Arkansas is like this. There are some small pockets where people are "normal". Most of these pockets are the result of an influx of people from big cities in large states. More than likely, these small pockets here are also the cities that have what few gay bars and clubs there are in Arkansas.
I haven't talked about many "political" topics on my blog, mostly because I am not very political by nature. I just tend to go with the flow of things. However, the hate formerly directed at people of other color is now being directed at people who are gay. (I say "formerly" but in reality it still exists—as was very evident by the verbal comments many people have expressed in the open with the results of this last presidential election.) While it may be a slight exaggeration that everyone is this way, it holds true for many.
The Husbear and I have three children, all from his previous marriage. While the kids are now technically adults, thanks to Initiative 1, I would never be able to adopt them if something happened to their mother and/or him to make them part of "our" family. Although technically we cannot be a "family" either since the Husbear and I cannot marry here due to legislation enacted during the 2004 election cycle that defined marriage in Arkansas.
I'm not sure where I was going with all of this other than to give readers an understanding of what life is like in Arkansas, and maybe why I expect this from from those living in this state. I am not saying it's right. But it is the middle of the country, where all change is slow to happen.
It is hard to imagine that in the 21st century laws forbidding "rights" to a group of people would even be thought of—let alone passed—by the general population. But as the Husbear says: "it's a matter of time." For example, his grandfather didn't believe in interracial marriage. That generation died off. The next generation, his father, "tolerated" interracial marriage. That generation is dying off. And like most of his generation, the Husbear doesn't care who of one color marries who of another color because they know it doesn't matter.
Change takes time. You can "force" change, but hate will be built up on the inside until it festers and a tragic backlash occurs. Time, and leading by example, are the counters to this build-up. It's the only thing that has ever worked for me. Granted, I don't know what those people I'm "friends" with actually say about me when I'm not around or how they truly feel about gay people. But they are at least civil when I am in their presence. Sometimes that's all I can ask for.
Until next time...![]()
This is a rare post for me. It's not in my nature to post on topics that I feel others are better qualified and better spoken out about than I am. But leave it to me to not follow my own rules.
Joe.My.God. brought to my attention a recent Gallup poll which states that Americans are evenly divided on the morality of homosexuality.
I'm more interested in this:

Can someone please tell me why 70% of the polled think that divorce is morally acceptable?
Isn't marriage supposed to have some "sanctity" about it? Isn't that what I keep hearing as the reason as to why same-sex marriages shouldn't be allowed?
Gawd forbid any Christian use their own theology to guide them. After all, according to Matthew 19:6:
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.
There's also Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:11, Luke 16:18, and 1 Cor 7:10-11 for extra guidance. I can go on....
This sampling obviously thinks married men and women having an affair is morally wrong (91%). Yet according to their own rule book, God says adultery is wrong. Yet adultery is the only reason God allows for the dissolution of marriage. (Technically there are two other valid reasons in the Big Book: death of a spouse [Romans 7:2, 1 Corinthians 7:39], and if a non-believer leaves a believer [1 Corinthians 7:12-16].)
So... is my logic flawed here? Is the incredibly high divorce rate we see today the result of so many adulterous individuals? If so, how moral can they be? Or is this ANOTHER case of picking and choosing what applies to them versus what applies to everyone else?
As best said by Mrs. Betty Bowers: "Marriages Are Like Lay's Potato Chips to American Christians: They Can't Stop At Just One!"
I personally think we are going about this whole same-sex marriage thing the wrong way!
Instead of pushing to legalize same-sex marriage, we should instead pass laws that forbid divorce. Well, maybe we should allow one reason for the dissolution of a marriage: proven adultery, and that's it. We should also pass laws that state ONCE you are divorced, you are no longer allowed to marry again. EVER! You get just ONE shot at it—then you are out of the marriage pool.
Eventually there would be maybe 10,000 married couples left (half of which are probably cheating on each other anyway). Everyone else would then get screwed on tax breaks, partner benefits, legal protection, etc.—all of the things we are fighting to get for the person we love. Maybe then no one would really give a fuck who marries who.
Just my five cents. I know I'm probably going to get some hate mail about my attitude on this topic. I know it's really about equal rights for our loved ones. I'm just trying to point out the obviously huge flaw in today's "sanctity of marriage" argument that most American's fall for, and why no one ever calls "them" out on it.
Until next time...![]()
Today marks my 35th revolution around the sun after having been expelled from the womb into this wonderful place we call "reality".

Why?
Today, June 17, 2008, also marks the day same-sex couples are able to legally get married in California. I guess technically they started last night. Hopefully this will "stick" this time.
I'm sure more events of greater importance than my expulsion from a huge, gaping vagina happened today as well, but I'm rather Erik-centric. I do find it funny that today was the Battle of the Rosebud.
Until next time...![]()
Dilemma?
Wednesday night while working on a client at the tattoo shop, I received a telephone call from a family member. I only took the call because I thought it was an emergency due to the recent events with my father. This family member harshly accused me of something. Precisely—they accused me of stealing a large sum of money. This family member—being the wonderful "Christian" they are—apparently is of the "guilty until proven innocent" mentality. Is it any wonder I moved all the way from Florida to Arkansas?
I did not take this money, not that the family member seems to believe this. I would never steal (at least not intentionally) and more so I would never steal from my own family. However, I have no way to prove that I didn't do this stealing of which I am being accused. I had opportunity—to which I was unaware—and as for motive? I have no "moral" character since I am both gay and have tattoos. Two strikes against me?
I see people being suspicious and thinking less of people who have ink that is visible to the public. I deal with it every day as both a tattoo artist and as a person with ink. I don't really understand it at all. I know the history of tattooing. I know how different cultures see tattoos. I know where the American stereotypes come from. I think it is a stereotype that will take at least another generation to dissipate. I have tattooed what I consider the full spectrum of people: from people barely scraping by, to those who make more in a day than I will in my lifetime; individuals fresh out of jail having served their mandated time, to doctors and attorneys who probably should be in jail for doing things that would keep me up at night.
We are all human. Why do we lose sight of that?
Then there's the whole being gay "issue". It's a little different of a "stereotype" to me because I believe people today have a choice to be tattooed. (Yes, there are probably people who choose to be gay, but I don't think that is the norm at all. Just as there are people who have not chosen to get tattooed but where done so by force.) People fear and shun what they don't understand or what they see in themselves that they don't want to publicly admit to the world. Enough people have discoursed on that over time I will leave it alone for now.
Why as humans do we have to "isolate" what's different: people of a different color; people of a different weight; people who have decided to decorate the outside of the "temples" they reside in. Why don't we stereotype people who's earlobes are attached to their face versus people have dangling earlobes?
As for my "two strikes" that my family sees—I don't think that will ever change. Their brains are now trained and hard-wired to think the way they do. I went down to Florida to see my father when he had his heart attack for what could have been the last time. It now might just be.
Until next time...![]()
Name: Erik Rubright
Location: Pea Ridge, AR
The most nonchalant, non-enthusiastic gay man you'll ever meet.
68°F


