Making this up as I go. Kind of.

For those of you who don't visit my site directly (i.e., those who use an RSS Reader), I added a new page to my website called "adlibbed":

The posts that go to that page have been excluded from the RSS feed for my blog, and they don't show up in my blogs regular time-line either. Unless you go to that page.

Why you ask?

Mostly because I use that page to post non "blog-worthy" photo items.

You know, those random pictures that just don't need to be blogged about, but I felt compelled to tweet. (You do follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook, right?) It's my own pseudo-tumblr, as it were. (Another social site on which I also have an account, but it's *mostly* just re-posts from my adlibbed page. For the moment.)

Again, "Why?", you ask?

I used to use third-party sites like TwitPic and yfrog to post photos that I'd tweet. But I got to thinking, why am I using those sites when I have my own website? And I have TOTAL control over my content. Well, at least as much control as one person can have with any media on the Internet.

Do you really know what those sites are doing with your photos? How do you know you haven't signed away your rights when using them and your work gets published and you get no credit for it? Have you really read their "Terms Of Service" agreements? There's a lot of nasty, legal mumbo-jumbo and forfeiting of your rights when you use them.

Not that I particularly care when it comes to things I've tweeted. Maybe I'm just a control freak.

However, if you want to subscribe to the RSS feed for my adlibbed stuff, here's the link to do that. It's quite random, more so than my blog. Or you could follow me on Twitter and see it when I post.

Because you know you want to. ;-)

And you will get to see random pictures like this:

Until next time...
Erik

2 comments
posted 434 days ago at 3:26 pm in Ponderings

The Sedition Act?

Call it coincidence that I have been watching the John Adams HBO miniseries. Recommended watching, even if it does contain some inaccuracies.

Tonight I watched the last two episodes in the miniseries. The 6th installment mentioned what are now called the Alien and Sedition Acts. Congress passed the Acts (actually four different laws) in 1798 while under threat of war from France. The legislation was intended to stomp out political opposition.

One of these laws struck me as familiar in a peculiar way: "An Act for the Punishment of Certain Crimes against the United States (Sedition Act), July 14, 1798 ch. 74, 1 Stat. 596”. More commonly called "The Sedition Act", this law made it illegal to publish "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" against the government or its officials.

Censorship.

The Great Retail Empire somewhat recently enacted what is called the "Social Media Policy (PD-73)". The policy states:

Using social media can be a fun and rewarding way to share opinions with friends, family and co-workers around the world.
...
... you have the responsibility to post content in a respectful manner that will not be harmful to the company.
...
... if you decide to post complaints or criticism, avoid doing so in a way that is unprofessional, defamatory, or injurious to the company or other associates.

Failure to do so "may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination."

My question is: who decides what is seditious? Wait—I meant "injurious". As I noted in my last post concerning the layoffs that occurred at the Great Retail Empire, it is entirely possible "disciplinary action" may be levied against me because I expressed my opinion. Since we all know "the truth hurts", it would imply that anything I mention of the Great Retail Empire—either false or true—could be deemed "injurious".

Today, oddly enough, someone whom the Great Retail Empire would prohibit me having any association with outside of the office [that's another policy...] stated so eloquently in an Internet MeMe:

I'm cynical of governments and corporations. I think there's little to differentiate large corporations from large governments, and the boundaries between them are increasingly blurred. As Orwell said "The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

I could, in no way, have better expressed my thoughts on the subject.

When any entity gets so large that it has to start creating and enforcing laws and policies to protect it's image from those "within", one has to question why those policies and laws needed to be created to begin with. Is there something to hide from the those on the outside?

"Welcome to the Machine" now has new meaning for me.

I guess I'll just have to wait and see if any of my thoughts are injurious to the Great Retail Empire.

Until next time...
Erik

3 comments
posted 1082 days ago at 10:33 pm in Ponderings

Back to the “social”…

I caved in to social pressure. I have had enough clients at the tattoo shop (and a few friends and family) ask where I went online, so I created accounts back on MySpace and Facebook.

I'm sure I'll regret it eventually, but it seems a lot of clients (and friends and family) are actually part of the social... and by social I don't mean Zune.

If you're on one of these (and I know some of you are!) feel me up if you'd like.

MySpace
Facebook

Until next time...
Erik

3 comments
posted 1314 days ago at 9:19 am in Ponderings

Twatter… er, Twitter.

I've been sucked in to yet another "thing" to keep me from being focused on anything. I finally had to see what Twitter was all about. Now I've started "tweeting".

Something else to do with my phone during the day now, besides actually texting my friends and buddy. What could be more egotistical of me than posting random "where I ams" and "what I'm thinkings" during the day. Wait, I guess I do that with my blog already somewhat.

One of these days someone will wonder why so many people can't focus... ooh, another tweet....

Hit me up if you are a tweeter.

Until next time...
Erik

4 comments
posted 1320 days ago at 5:42 pm in Ponderings

When social networks go “ugh”?

I deleted both my MySpace account and my FaceBook account today. Over the last few months, I have found them to become quite... "high school-ish." I originally created these accounts so I could find people from my past and visa-versa.

I think the social networking concept is a great one. I like the idea of a network where I can go and search for and easily communicate with my friends and family via message (either post or real-time).

Well, I did until the whole "applications" thing started. The "Pieces of Flair" and the "I just bought you as my pet" things got annoying enough to me that it ruined the concept of what a social network should be to me. It's all that crap I could do without. As much as I dislike Bear411 (for reasons other than these), I like the fact that I can search for friends and easily communicate with them. Nothing else.

Then there is the web design aspect. FaceBook at least looked uniform (which did stifle self-expression). MySpace, on the other hand, propagates bad web design. Nothing like browsing to a webpage that autoplays some obnoxious song at you. Did people learn nothing from the blink tag era? Granted, most of the people using these sites probably weren't even around when the blink tag went nuts.

Just my opinion.

Until next time...
Erik

11 comments
posted 1356 days ago at 9:22 am in Ponderings
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site! I use it to trap bad bots.
You're using wind power right now.
Stop SOPA