I notice the laces are shorter on this pair than any previous ones I have owned. Hmm…. 36.348328-94.2107766Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Like this:Like Loading...
Those are for when I’m kicking around the house, or at the pool, or lake, or river. Chucks are my daily wear. Loading... Reply
Why do you call them Chucks? As far as I know in New England (CT) we don’t call them that…in fact I don’t think they have a name Loading... Reply
I’ve always known them as “Chucks” or “Chuck Ts” all my life. It’s odd up there they’re not called that. http://www.chucksconnection.com/articles/ConverseArt48.html Loading... Reply
The link was interesting. I tried them on once. There is no support, they would kill the bottom of my feet. I like the way they look, to bad my feet don’t like them. Loading... Reply
They are a great shoe. I’ve lost count of how many I’ve owned. This is the first red pair I’ve had in years. Mostly because my feet are rather long and I tend to think I look like Ronald McDonald with them on. Loading... Reply
What happened to the vibrams???
Those are for when I’m kicking around the house, or at the pool, or lake, or river. Chucks are my daily wear.
Why do you call them Chucks? As far as I know in New England (CT) we don’t call them that…in fact I don’t think they have a name
I’ve always known them as “Chucks” or “Chuck Ts” all my life. It’s odd up there they’re not called that.
http://www.chucksconnection.com/articles/ConverseArt48.html
The link was interesting. I tried them on once. There is no support, they would kill the bottom of my feet. I like the way they look, to bad my feet don’t like them.
oooh, I have a pair of treaders just like them !
They are a great shoe. I’ve lost count of how many I’ve owned.
This is the first red pair I’ve had in years. Mostly because my feet are rather long and I tend to think I look like Ronald McDonald with them on.